Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could survive after the amount on which it was founded was held not to be includible in the assessee's income.
Analysis: The amount of Rs. 1,00,000, which formed the basis of the penalty proceedings, had already been held not liable to be included in the assessee's income. Once that addition disappeared, the foundation for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ceased to exist. In that situation, the answer to the referred question became unnecessary.
Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained, as its very basis had become non-existent, and the reference was disposed of without answering the question.