Priority of income-tax claims in insolvency u/s 238 IBC denied; taxes not preferred over IBC creditors

Whether section 238, IBC, displaces Income-Tax Act priority: The Court held that section 238 establishes the Code's primacy over any inconsistent enactment, including the Income-Tax Act, invoking the doctrine that IBC overrides conflicting statutory provisions; accordingly Crown-type treatment of income-tax dues does not elevate them above claims under the IBC regime. Reasoning relied on precedential principle that tax demands are not entitled to preference even over secured creditors. Outcome: Appeal dismissed and tax claims do not obtain statutory priority under the IBC.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 overrides provisions of the Income-tax Act so that income-tax dues do not enjoy priority in insolvency proceedings.

Analysis: Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 gives the Code an overriding effect over any inconsistent enactment. The reasoning relies on established principle that income-tax dues, characterised as Crown debts, do not automatically take precedence over other creditors including secured creditors; relevant judicial precedent on the nature and priority of tax claims in insolvency proceedings is applied to the facts.

Conclusion: Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 overrides inconsistent provisions of the Income-tax Act and income-tax dues do not have priority in insolvency; decision is in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 confers an overriding effect on the Code over inconsistent statutory provisions, and therefore tax dues do not enjoy statutory precedence in the insolvency hierarchy.

---