TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a non-resident shipping company was entitled to deduct deferred rebate allowed to shippers from gross freight earnings while computing income from shipping business under section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether a foreign shipping company was entitled to set off brought forward unabsorbed loss represented by unabsorbed depreciation against its income for the relevant assessment year.
Issue (i): Whether a non-resident shipping company was entitled to deduct deferred rebate allowed to shippers from gross freight earnings while computing income from shipping business under section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the earlier decision of the Court on the interpretation of section 44B in the context of shipping business income computation. The deferred rebate claimed by the assessee was considered not deductible from the gross freight earnings for this purpose.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether a foreign shipping company was entitled to set off brought forward unabsorbed loss represented by unabsorbed depreciation against its income for the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The issue was also governed by an earlier decision of the Court dealing with the availability of set-off of earlier years' unabsorbed depreciation in the computation of the assessee's shipping income. The claim for such set-off was rejected.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: All the referred questions were decided against the assessee, and the references stood answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For computation of shipping business income under section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, deferred rebate is not deductible from gross freight earnings, and the claimed set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation against such income is not allowable where the governing precedent so holds.
TaxTMI 
