Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings were vitiated by delay in completion notwithstanding the statutory time limit, and whether the petitioner's alleged limited partnership period could be examined in the original petition.
Analysis: The assessments were found to be governed by the time limit introduced by sub-section (6) of Section 17, including the proviso permitting pending assessments as on 1 April 1993 to be completed within four years from the publication of the Kerala Finance Act, 1993. Since the assessments were within the statutory period, the alleged unreasonableness of delay could not be used to cut down the time allowed by the legislature. The petitioner's contention regarding her factual role as a partner was held to be a matter for the appropriate authorities and not a ground for interference in the original petition.
Conclusion: The challenge to the assessments on the ground of delay failed, and the petition was not entertained.
Final Conclusion: The assessments were held to be within the statutory period, and no interference was warranted in the original petition.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the legislature prescribes a specific period for completion of assessment, a court will not invalidate an assessment on the ground of general delay if it is completed within that statutory period.