Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Risograph printing machine was classifiable under sub-heading 8443.50 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act as claimed by the importer, or under sub-heading 8472.90 as duplicating machines.
Analysis: The question had already been settled in earlier Tribunal precedent, which, after considering the HSN Explanatory Notes to Heading 84.43 and the nature of the machine, held that Risograph could not be treated as an offset printing machine classifiable under Heading 84.43. The earlier reasoning was followed, and no reason was found to depart from that classification. The machine was therefore treated as an office machine having duplicating function rather than printing machinery under Heading 84.43.
Conclusion: The classification under sub-heading 8472.90 was upheld and the appellant's claim under sub-heading 8443.50 was rejected.