<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 808 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278749</link>
    <description>Risograph printing machines were held classifiable as duplicating machines under sub-heading 8472.90 rather than as offset printing machinery under sub-heading 8443.50. The earlier Tribunal precedent, read with the HSN Explanatory Notes to Heading 84.43 and the machine&#039;s functional nature, was followed to conclude that Risograph does not fall within the scope of Heading 84.43. The result was rejection of the importer&#039;s claim for classification under 8443.50 and affirmation of classification under 8472.90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 808 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278749</link>
      <description>Risograph printing machines were held classifiable as duplicating machines under sub-heading 8472.90 rather than as offset printing machinery under sub-heading 8443.50. The earlier Tribunal precedent, read with the HSN Explanatory Notes to Heading 84.43 and the machine&#039;s functional nature, was followed to conclude that Risograph does not fall within the scope of Heading 84.43. The result was rejection of the importer&#039;s claim for classification under 8443.50 and affirmation of classification under 8472.90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>