Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 44 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 authorised imposition of penalty under section 28(1) on partners of a discontinued firm.
Analysis: Section 44 makes the partners of a discontinued firm jointly and severally liable for assessment and for tax payable, and also provides that all the provisions of Chapter IV shall, so far as may be, apply to such assessment. The Court preferred the view that section 28, being a provision in Chapter IV and dealing with defaults connected with assessment, applies to an assessment under section 44. The contrary approach treated section 44 as insufficient to support penalty, but the Court held that the language of section 44 is broad enough to include penalty proceedings connected with the assessment.
Conclusion: Section 44 authorised imposition of penalty under section 28(1), and the petition failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a provision relating to a discontinued firm extends all provisions of the assessment chapter to such assessment, penalty provisions within that chapter apply if they are connected with the assessment process.