Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 44 of the Income-tax Act, an Income-tax Officer has jurisdiction to impose a penalty under section 28 and to recover the share of such penalty from erstwhile partners of a firm which has been discontinued or dissolved.
Analysis: Section 44 makes every person who was a partner at the time of discontinuance jointly and severally liable in respect of the income, profits and gains of the firm and provides that all the provisions of Chapter IV shall, so far as may be, apply to any such assessment. Section 28 is a Chapter IV provision penalising concealment of income and defaults in the assessment process. The wording of section 44, unlike section 25A(2), incorporates the applicability of Chapter IV provisions to assessments of discontinued firms, permitting the application of section 28 to such assessments to the extent appropriate. The requirement of mens rea is not an absolute prerequisite where the statute imposes liability by its terms; section 44's joint and several assessment framework allows penal provisions of Chapter IV to operate against erstwhile partners for defaults relating to the firm's assessment.
Conclusion: Section 28 applies to assessments made under section 44 and the Income-tax Officer has jurisdiction to impose and recover the penalty from the erstwhile partners; decision is in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute expressly makes Chapter IV assessments applicable to discontinued firms, the penal provisions within Chapter IV, including section 28, may be applied to erstwhile partners by virtue of the joint and several liability created by section 44.