Penalty liability under section 28(1)(c) cannot be imposed on a dissolved firm; section 44 does not extend penalties.

The article explains that penalties under section 28(1)(c) target a "person" for concealment or deliberate inaccuracy but cannot validly be imposed on a firm that had ceased to exist when the penalty order was made. Section 44 assimilates assessment and tax recovery mechanisms for discontinued or dissolved firms by making former partners jointly and severally liable for tax, but it does not convert or extend that assessment mechanism into vicarious liability for penalties under the separate statutory penalty scheme. Operative effect: penalties imposed on a dissolved juristic entity are invalid.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalties under section 28(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could be validly levied on a firm (the assessee) after the firm had been dissolved, and whether section 44 of the Income-tax Act saves such penalties from invalidity due to dissolution.

Analysis: The penalties were levied on the assessee as the firm registered under section 26A. Section 28(1)(c) permits imposition of penalty on a "person" for concealment or deliberate inaccuracy in particulars of income. The firm ceased to exist before the date on which penalties were imposed. Section 44 makes former partners jointly and severally liable to assessment and for tax payable in respect of income of a discontinued or dissolved firm, and makes the provisions of Chapter IV applicable "so far as may be" to such assessment. The provisions for assessment to tax under Chapter IV and the separate statutory scheme for imposition of penalties under section 28 operate distinctly. The liability to pay tax arising from an assessment is different in character from a penalty imposed under section 28(1). Section 44 brings into Chapter IV the mechanism for assessment and recovery of tax from quondam partners but does not, by express terms or necessary intendment, create vicarious liability for penalties imposed under the separate penalty provisions of section 28(1). Therefore section 44 does not authorise imposition of a penalty on a juristic person that had ceased to exist on the date the penalty order was made.

Conclusion: The penalties levied on the dissolved firm under section 28(1)(c) are invalid; the petitions are allowed and the orders imposing the penalties and the Commissioner's confirmation are set aside (result in favour of the assessee).

---