TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, for a route covered by a notified scheme, the permission of the Transport Commissioner under Rule 258(2)(ii) of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 must be obtained before an application for permit is filed. (ii) Whether the Transport Commissioner's power to extend a town service route beyond 8 kilometres from the limits of the municipality or town is unlimited.
Issue (i): Whether, for a route covered by a notified scheme, the permission of the Transport Commissioner under Rule 258(2)(ii) of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 must be obtained before an application for permit is filed.
Analysis: Rule 258 regulates the identification of town service routes, while Sections 98 to 100 and 104 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 give overriding effect to a notified scheme and prohibit permits inconsistent with it. Where a scheme creates an exception for town service routes, an applicant must first show that the route answers that description. If the route extends beyond 8 kilometres from the municipality or town, the Transport Commissioner's specific permission is a necessary precondition to the Regional Transport Authority's consideration of the permit application. The Commissioner's permission is thus foundational to the determination of the route as a town service route under the exception.
Conclusion: Yes. The permission of the Transport Commissioner under Rule 258(2)(ii) must be obtained before an application for permit is filed in respect of a route covered by a notified scheme.
Issue (ii): Whether the Transport Commissioner's power to extend a town service route beyond 8 kilometres from the limits of the municipality or town is unlimited.
Analysis: Although Rule 258(2)(ii) does not state an express maximum for the Commissioner's permission, the power cannot be exercised so as to defeat the statutory limit or the scheme's restrictions. The extension must not convert a town service into a muffassil service, must be exercised on relevant considerations, and must preserve the scheme's exceptions rather than make them the rule. The Commissioner must therefore act within legally implied limits and with due application of mind to the nature of the route and the scheme governing it.
Conclusion: No. The power is not unlimited and must be exercised in an appropriate manner in accordance with the statutory scheme and the guiding principles laid down.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, the contrary orders were set aside, and the Regional Transport Authority's refusal of permits was restored on the governing interpretation of the scheme and Rule 258.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notified transport scheme governs a route, the exception for town service routes under Rule 258 operates only if the route satisfies the rule and the scheme, and any administrative discretion to extend the route must be exercised within implied legal limits so as not to nullify the scheme.
TaxTMI 
