Company liquidation ordered after failure to secure Resolution Plan.

The Company Petition under section 10 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed. Despite efforts to invite a Resolution Plan, none was received within the required timeframe, leading to the decision for liquidation. The Tribunal declined to appoint the Resolution Professional as Liquidator due to insufficient progress in completing the Resolution Plan and requested the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India to recommend a suitable Liquidator. Orders were issued for communication with relevant authorities, public announcement of liquidation, and compliance with liquidation procedures under Chapter III of the regulations for Corporate Persons.

---

---

Issues:
1. Admission of Company Petition under section 10 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Progress report and Committee of Creditors' meetings.
3. Completion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process within prescribed time.
4. Appointment of Resolution Professional as Liquidator.
5. Adequate steps for inviting Resolution Plan.
6. Communication with Registrar of Companies and Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India.
7. Liquidation process and moratorium orders.

Analysis:
1. The Company Petition (1B) was filed by the Corporate Debtor under section 10 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, alleging financial distress exceeding assets, losses in operations, and negative cash flow for specific years. The petition was admitted, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.

2. The Interim Resolution Professional conducted meetings with the Committee of Creditors, where decisions were made to appoint him as Resolution Professional. However, no Resolution Plan was received within the stipulated time frame. Only one meeting of the Committee of Creditors took place, and no extension was recommended, leading to the decision for liquidation.

3. The Resolution Professional reported the need for appropriate direction as the 180-day completion period was approaching without a Resolution Plan. The lack of progress in inviting proposals or seeking consent for liquidation raised concerns about the Resolution Professional's actions during the process.

4. The Tribunal decided not to appoint the Resolution Professional as Liquidator due to inadequate steps taken for completing the Resolution Plan. A request was made to the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India for recommending a suitable Liquidator.

5. Orders were passed to communicate with the Registrar of Companies, inform the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India for a Liquidator appointment, issue a public announcement for liquidation, and cease the moratorium under specific sections of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

6. The Liquidator, upon appointment, was instructed to follow the prescribed procedures for liquidation under Chapter III of the regulations for Corporate Persons. A further progress report was scheduled for a specified date to monitor the proceedings effectively.

---