Supreme Court India 2009 Case Dismissed After Delay Condoned The Supreme Court of India in 2009 dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vivek Tankha, A.S.G., Mr. H. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court India 2009 Case Dismissed After Delay Condoned
The Supreme Court of India in 2009 dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vivek Tankha, A.S.G., Mr. H. Raghavendra Rao, Adv., Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., while the respondent was represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra, Adv., Ms. Kav.
A Supreme Court order in the cited matter records the procedural rulings: "Delay condoned." and "Dismissed." The court formally excused the procedural delay in filing but nonetheless denied the substantive relief sought by dismissing the petition. The short order contains no substantive reasoning or elaboration of legal principles in the excerpt provided; it reflects purely the court's disposition and procedural treatment of the petition. The practical effect is dual: the applicant's delay was retrospectively regularized for purposes of hearing, yet the petition was ultimately rejected on its merits or for other grounds not stated in the order, leaving no recorded precedent or ratio in this fragment to guide future decisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
