TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court India 2009 Case Dismissed After Delay Condoned</h1> <h3>C.I.T. -III, NEW DELHI Versus SHRIRAM PISTONS & RINGS LTD.</h3> The Supreme Court of India in 2009 dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vivek Tankha, A.S.G., Mr. H. ... - A Supreme Court order in the cited matter records the procedural rulings: 'Delay condoned.' and 'Dismissed.' The court formally excused the procedural delay in filing but nonetheless denied the substantive relief sought by dismissing the petition. The short order contains no substantive reasoning or elaboration of legal principles in the excerpt provided; it reflects purely the court's disposition and procedural treatment of the petition. The practical effect is dual: the applicant's delay was retrospectively regularized for purposes of hearing, yet the petition was ultimately rejected on its merits or for other grounds not stated in the order, leaving no recorded precedent or ratio in this fragment to guide future decisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
