<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 1002 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276601</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2009 dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vivek Tankha, A.S.G., Mr. H. Raghavendra Rao, Adv., Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., while the respondent was represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra, Adv., Ms. Kav.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 1002 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276601</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2009 dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vivek Tankha, A.S.G., Mr. H. Raghavendra Rao, Adv., Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., while the respondent was represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra, Adv., Ms. Kav.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>