Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit primarily seeking cancellation of a registered sale deed and a declaration regarding the plaintiff's rights is governed by Section 7(iv)(b) and (c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 or requires ad valorem court fee on the sale consideration.
Analysis: The decisive test for court-fee is the substance of the relief disclosed in the plaint, not the form of drafting. Where the main relief is cancellation of a registered conveyance, a mere declaratory prayer is only ancillary. Since the suit directly challenged the validity of the registered sale deed for a consideration of Rs. 1,62,000/-, the relief could not be treated as one falling within the plaintiff's unrestricted valuation under Section 7(iv)(b) and (c). The correct fee had to be determined on the basis of the substantive relief of cancellation of the sale deed, which attracted ad valorem court fee on the sale consideration.
Conclusion: Ad valorem court fee was payable, and the trial court's order directing payment of such fee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed because the challenge was in substance a suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed, not a mere declaratory suit with discretionary valuation.
Ratio Decidendi: For court-fee purposes, the court must look to the substantive relief sought in the plaint, and a suit whose principal relief is cancellation of a registered sale deed attracts ad valorem court fee on the consideration mentioned in the deed.