Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by Tribunal citing Rule 19.

The appeal before the ITAT Delhi, arising from an order by Ld. CIT(A) New Delhi for the assessment year 2007-08, was dismissed for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to appear despite notice. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of actively pursuing appeals, citing precedents. Following Rule 19 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, the appeal was treated as unadmitted and dismissed. The decision was rendered on 19.12.2011.

---

---

Issues involved: Non-prosecution of appeal by the assessee.

Summary:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi, arising from an order by Ld. CIT(A) New Delhi for the assessment year 2007-08, was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the assessee nor their representative appeared for the hearing despite advance notice. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that merely filing an appeal is not sufficient; it must be effectively pursued. Referring to previous cases, including CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee and Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of active participation in the appeal process. In line with Rule 19 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, the appeal was treated as unadmitted and dismissed in limine. The decision was pronounced on 19.12.2011 after the hearing concluded.

---