Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit of duty paid on inputs and capital goods could be denied when the final products were exempted but duty was voluntarily paid on them, and whether the demand and penalty could therefore be sustained.
Analysis: The appellants were manufacturing goods falling under Chapters 15 and 38 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and had availed Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of the final products. The dispute arose because the final products were said to be wholly exempt under Notification No. 115/75. The controlling principle applied was that where the assessee has chosen to discharge duty on the exempted goods, denial of Modvat credit is not justified, since the exercise is revenue neutral. The issue was treated as settled by the Supreme Court decisions relied upon in the order.
Conclusion: The credit could not be denied and the demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: When an assessee elects to pay duty on goods otherwise exempt from duty, Modvat credit on the inputs used in their manufacture cannot be denied because the transaction is revenue neutral.