1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Income from ICICI Bank Classified as 'Income from House Property' by Tribunal, Revenue's Appeal Dismissed</h1> The Tribunal confirmed the classification of income received from ICICI bank as 'income from house property', dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The ... - Issues involved: Determination of whether income received from ICICI bank should be assessed as 'income from house property' or as 'income from other sources'.Issue 1: Classification of income from ICICI bankThe Revenue raised the dispute regarding the classification of income received from ICICI bank. The Tribunal referred to a previous case for A.Y 2005-06 where a similar issue was decided. It was noted that the assessee had been in possession of the premises for 40 years, with the tenancy right received after the dissolution of a partnership. The property owners allowed the creation of a sub-tenancy with ICICI Bank Ltd. for 15 years. The Tribunal found that the assessee became a deemed owner as per the provisions of section 27[iiib] r.w.s. 269UA(f)(i) of the Act. The agreement with ICICI Bank Ltd. for 15 years supported the assessee's claim as the deemed owner, entitling them to deduction u/s.24(a) of the Act. Citing precedents from Mumbai Tribunal and Calcutta Tribunal, the Tribunal held in favor of the assessee, confirming the order of the CIT(A) and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.Decision:The Tribunal decided the issue against the Revenue, confirming the classification of income received from ICICI bank as 'income from house property'. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on December 29, 2010.