Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rental income received from ICICI Bank in respect of the premises let out under the sub-tenancy arrangement was assessable as income from house property and whether the assessee was to be treated as a deemed owner for the purpose of deduction under section 24(a).
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case for a prior assessment year, where the same arrangement had been examined and the assessee had been held to be a deemed owner under section 27(iiib) read with section 269UA(f)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the facts already considered in the earlier year, the sub-tenancy receipts were held to arise from a situation attracting house property treatment, and no new material or change in law was shown to justify a different view. The Revenue failed to controvert the binding coordinate bench precedent or show any distinguishing feature.
Conclusion: The rental income was held taxable under the head income from house property, and the assessee's claim was accepted; the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee is treated as a deemed owner under section 27(iiib) read with section 269UA(f)(i) on the basis of the existing sub-tenancy arrangement, the rent received from such occupation is assessable as income from house property and the corresponding deduction under section 24(a) is available.