Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit of service tax was admissible on catering and rent-a-cab services to the extent the cost was recovered from employees.
Analysis: The Tribunal found the dispute to be covered by the Bombay High Court's ruling that credit is not allowable on the portion of service tax borne by the ultimate consumer of the service. Since the recovered amount represented service cost borne by employees, the manufacturer could not claim credit on that portion. No contrary factual or legal basis was shown to disturb the denial of credit.
Conclusion: The credit was not admissible to the extent it related to amounts recovered from employees, and the denial of cenvat credit was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order denying the disputed credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit cannot be taken for the portion of service tax embedded in the cost of a service recovered from the employee who is the ultimate consumer of that service.