2016 (2) TMI 552
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peal No. PI/RKS/04/2011 dated 10.1.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune I, upholding the order-in-original dated 29.9.2010. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of wire & cables and OFC falling under Chapter Heading No. 85.44 and 90.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 respectively, and they are availilng the benef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....but the appellant has written a letter to this Tribunal to decide the case on merits. 4. The learned AR for the respondent submitted that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CCE, Nagpur vs. Ultratech Cement Ltd. reported in 2010 (260) ELT 369 (Bom.). He further submitted that in the said judgment in para 39, the H....