CENVAT credit on exported grey fabrics governed by Rule 57CC, with actual export unaffected by absence of bond or LUT.

Rule 57CC, not Rule 57C, governed the credit consequence for duty-paid yarn used in manufacturing grey fabrics falling under Chapters 50 to 63. Because the composite mill used both in-house yarn and duty-paid locally procured yarn, the premise for denying credit and demanding a percentage of clearances was incorrect, and only the credit attributable to inputs contained in the final products was relevant. Actual export of the grey fabrics was not defeated merely because no bond or letter of undertaking was executed, where export had in fact taken place. The demand, interest and penalties were therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether Rule 57C applied so as to deny CENVAT credit on duty-paid yarn used in the manufacture of grey fabrics exported or cleared to the assessee's sister unit, and whether the case was instead governed by Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; (ii) whether export of the goods without execution of bond or letter of undertaking disentitled the assessee to relief.

Issue (i): whether Rule 57C applied so as to deny CENVAT credit on duty-paid yarn used in the manufacture of grey fabrics exported or cleared to the assessee's sister unit, and whether the case was instead governed by Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The assessee was a composite mill using both in-house manufactured yarn and duty-paid locally procured yarn for grey fabrics. The grey fabrics fell within Chapters 50 to 63, attracting the special treatment under Rule 57CC, by virtue of which sub-rule (1) was inapplicable and sub-rule (5) required payment only of the credit attributable to inputs contained in such final products. Since duty had already been discharged on in-house yarn under Rule 49A and the locally procured yarn was admittedly duty paid, the premise for invoking Rule 57C and demanding 5% or 10% of the value of clearances was incorrect.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and Rule 57C was held inapplicable.

Issue (ii): whether export of the goods without execution of bond or letter of undertaking disentitled the assessee to relief.

Analysis: The grey fabrics were in fact exported, and the absence of bond or letter of undertaking did not by itself defeat the assessee's entitlement. The reasoning adopted was consistent with the view that export of exempt goods without bond or LUT does not bar relief where the goods are actually exported and the substantive requirements are met.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used in the manufacture of final products falling under Chapters 50 to 63, Rule 57CC governs the credit consequence, and actual export of the goods is not defeated merely because bond or letter of undertaking was not executed.

---