<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and regulations and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s demand for payment based on the availed CENVAT credit. The appellant was found to have correctly availed CENVAT credit on locally purchased yarn and had followed the necessary procedures for clearing goods for export. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and regulations and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s demand for payment based on the availed CENVAT credit. The appellant was found to have correctly availed CENVAT credit on locally purchased yarn and had followed the necessary procedures for clearing goods for export. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>