TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the Customs House Agent licence could be sustained when proceedings under Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 had not been initiated.
Analysis: The licence had been suspended under Regulation 20(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 and the suspension was later confirmed. However, no proceedings under Regulation 22 had been initiated against the appellant even up to the date of decision. In the absence of initiation of the prescribed further proceedings, the suspension order could not be sustained in law.
Conclusion: The suspension order was unsustainable and was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
