Appeal dismissed, Tribunal upholds Assessing Officer's additions under Income Tax Act, no relief granted.

The appeal was dismissed in its entirety, with the Tribunal upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The grounds challenging various additions under the Income Tax Act were dismissed, resulting in no relief granted to the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Grounds no.4 and 7 - Relief granted under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Grounds no.12 and 10 - General in nature, no specific adjudication required.
3. Grounds no.3 and 6 - Addition of Rs. 55,000 as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act.
4. Grounds no.8 and 9 - Addition of Rs. 2,60,000 and Rs. 2,50,000 claimed to have been received from Shri Premji Maroo and Shri Jaideep Patel, respectively.

Detailed Analysis:

Grounds no.4 and 7:

The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that these grounds do not survive any more as the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has granted relief to the assessee in an order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, grounds no.4 and 7 were dismissed as "not pressed".

Grounds no.12 and 10:

These grounds were deemed general in nature and did not require specific adjudication.

Grounds no.3 and 6:

The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 55,000 as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. The facts reveal that the assessee, a company engaged in sub-broker and share dealing activities, filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs. nil. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) with a total income determined at Rs. 18,53,170, including additions under section 68. The Tribunal previously directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the additional evidence. The Assessing Officer, after further proceedings, added Rs. 18,31,997 under section 68 due to the assessee's failure to establish the genuineness of the cash credits.

The assessee appealed, and the learned Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter for fresh verification. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) accepted certain cash credits as genuine but confirmed additions for three parties, including Shri Hemnani, due to lack of confirmations and denial of transactions by two parties. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide corroborative evidence for the Rs. 55,000 credit from Shri Hemnani, and thus, upheld the addition as unexplained cash credit under section 68. Grounds no.3 and 6 were dismissed.

Grounds no.8 and 9:

The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 2,60,000 and Rs. 2,50,000 claimed to have been received from Shri Premji Maroo and Shri Jaideep Patel, respectively. During remand proceedings, both individuals denied paying these amounts to the assessee. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the additions based on these denials.

The assessee argued that despite the denials, these individuals conducted share transactions through the assessee, and their identities and PAN details were established. However, the Tribunal noted that both individuals denied any transactions and the assessee failed to provide additional evidence. The Tribunal found that the assessee could not establish the genuineness of the transactions and upheld the additions as unexplained credits. Grounds no.8 and 9 were dismissed.

Conclusion:

The assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety, with the Tribunal upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals).

Order:

Order pronounced in the open Court on 9.10.2015.

---