Service tax demand upheld for site formation services, but penalties were waived where the levy involved interpretative dispute.

Service tax demand on alleged site formation and clearance services was upheld because the issue had already been decided against the assessee and the demand was not contested. Penalties were nevertheless set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 because the levy involved a disputable interpretative question and reasonable cause existed for non-imposition of penal consequences. The operative effect is that the tax liability remained, but the penalty exposure was removed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the demand of service tax on the alleged provision of site formation and clearance services was sustainable; (ii) Whether the penalties were liable to be waived under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Issue (i): Whether the demand of service tax on the alleged provision of site formation and clearance services was sustainable.

Analysis: The issue had already been decided against the appellants in the cited precedent, and the appellants did not contest the confirmation of the duty demand.

Conclusion: The confirmation of service tax demand was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalties were liable to be waived under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis: The services involved were treated as disputable in nature and the scope of the levy required interpretative consideration, attracting the basis for waiver of penalty under Section 80.

Conclusion: The penalties were set aside.

Final Conclusion: The demand was sustained, but the penal consequences were removed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the tax demand is confirmed but the dispute turns on the interpretative scope of the service, penalty may be waived under Section 80 on the basis of reasonable cause.

---