Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a penalty imposed on a co-noticee under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could survive after the duty demand and penalty on the main noticee had already been set aside.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the demand against the main appellant had been set aside in an earlier order. On that basis, the basis for imposing penalty on the present appellant, who was a co-noticee, no longer survived. The Tribunal also waived the requirement of pre-deposit of penalty and proceeded to hear the appeal.
Conclusion: The penalty imposed on the present appellant was set aside and the appeal and stay petition were allowed.