Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (11) TMI 117 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal quashes reassessment under Income Tax Act, citing change of opinion without fresh material The Tribunal set aside the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding them impermissible based on a change ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal quashes reassessment under Income Tax Act, citing change of opinion without fresh material

                            The Tribunal set aside the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding them impermissible based on a change of opinion without fresh material. Consequently, issues regarding the withdrawal of deduction under Section 80IA(4) and the set-off of brought forward losses were not addressed. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition for delayed PF contributions, ruling that such payments before the return due date are allowable as expenditure. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legality of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Withdrawal of deduction under Section 80IA(4) without issuing a show cause notice.
                            3. Denial of set-off of brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamating companies.
                            4. Deletion of addition made on account of employees' contribution to PF after the due date.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147:
                            The assessee challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds of change of opinion, arguing that no fresh tangible material was available to justify the reopening. The original assessment was made under Section 143(3), and all relevant information, including the details of amalgamation, was provided during the scrutiny assessment. The Tribunal noted that the reassessment was based on material already available on record and not on any new information. The Tribunal cited several precedents, including CIT Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. and Asian Paints Ltd. Vs. DCIT, to emphasize that reassessment on the basis of change of opinion is impermissible. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were bad in law and set them aside.

                            2. Withdrawal of Deduction under Section 80IA(4) without Show Cause Notice:
                            The assessee contended that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] erred in withdrawing the deduction under Section 80IA(4) without issuing a show cause notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The Tribunal did not adjudicate this issue separately as it became academic following the setting aside of the reassessment proceedings.

                            3. Denial of Set-off of Brought Forward Business Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation:
                            The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in not allowing the set-off of brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating companies. The AO had disallowed these on the grounds that the amalgamating companies were not "industrial undertakings" as defined under Section 72A. The Tribunal did not need to adjudicate this issue separately due to the setting aside of the reassessment proceedings.

                            4. Deletion of Addition Made on Account of Employees' Contribution to PF after Due Date:
                            The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made for delayed payments of employees' contribution to PF and ESIC. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that contributions made before the due date of filing the return under the Income Tax Act are admissible as expenditure. The Tribunal relied on the judgments of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Ghatge Patil Transport Ltd. and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. to support this conclusion.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147. Consequently, the issues related to the withdrawal of deduction under Section 80IA(4) and the set-off of brought forward losses became academic. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the deletion of the addition made for delayed PF contributions, affirming that such contributions made before the due date of filing the return are allowable.

                            Order Pronounced:
                            The order was pronounced on Tuesday, the 06th day of October, 2015.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found