Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of recovery of the confirmed demand and penalty, and whether the exemption under Serial No. 91 of Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. could be denied for want of the certificate contemplated under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. when the goods were procured indigenously.
Analysis: The exemption condition in Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. did not expressly incorporate the certification requirement of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. for indigenous procurement. The appellant had shown that the goods were supplied under International Competitive Bidding and that a Project Authority Certificate had been issued. The absence of confirmation that similarly placed manufacturers had been proceeded against, coupled with the possibility of discriminatory treatment if the demanded certificate was insisted upon for domestic supplies, supported a prima facie case in favour of interim protection.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to complete waiver of the confirmed dues and penalties, and stay against recovery was granted till disposal of the appeal.