Tribunal upholds disallowance of Cenvat credit for penalty, requires cash deposit for penalty payment.

The Tribunal upheld the adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit and imposing a penalty, clarifying that Cenvat credit cannot be used to pay penalties. Despite remitting the disallowed credit and interest, the appellant was directed to make a compulsory cash deposit of 7.5% of the penalty within four weeks, as required by the law. The appellant's argument that the credit reversal sufficed as compliance with the law was rejected, emphasizing the distinct nature of penalty payments.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit, imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed against the adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit of &8377; 1,35,45,628/- and imposing a penalty equivalent to the disallowed amount. The appellant contested the penalty and disallowance of Cenvat credit, focusing on the penalty component.

2. The appellant failed to remit the compulsory 7.5% deposit required under the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant argued that since the entire disallowed Cenvat credit amount along with interest was remitted, the pre-deposit was unnecessary, as more than 7.5% of the liability had been paid.

3. The Tribunal clarified that Cenvat credit can only be used for duty and interest remittance, not for penalties. Even though the appellant had remitted the disallowed Cenvat credit and interest, this amount could not be used to pay the penalty. Therefore, the obligation to pay 7.5% of the penalty remained, and the appellant was directed to make the compulsory deposit in cash within four weeks.

4. The Tribunal upheld the office objections and rejected the appellant's argument that the Cenvat credit reversal constituted compliance with the amended Section 35F of the Act. The appellant was instructed to make the required deposit to fulfill the obligation under the law.

This detailed analysis covers the issues raised in the appeal against the adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit and imposing a penalty, along with the Tribunal's decision regarding the compulsory deposit under the Central Excise Act, 1944.

---