Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax collected under a deferment scheme, and later prepaid at net present value under the State sales tax law, was deductible from the assessable value for central excise duty as sales tax actually paid or actually payable.
Analysis: The expression "transaction value" under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 had to be determined at the time and place of removal. Under the deferment scheme, the assessee was statutorily liable to pay the full sales tax amount at a future date, and the option of premature payment at net present value did not alter the amount of sales tax actually payable on the date of removal. The State law deemed such prepayment to be discharge of the deferred tax liability, and the Board's circulars consistently recognised deferred sales tax as deductible. The decision in Super Synotex was distinguished because that case concerned a sales tax incentive/exemption structure where part of the tax was never payable, not a deferment scheme with prepayment at net present value.
Conclusion: The deferred sales tax was deductible from the assessable value, and the differential between the deferred tax amount and the net present value payment could not be added to the transaction value.