Annual capacity of a hot re-rolling mill remanded for fresh adjudication under binding precedent and capacity rules

Annual capacity determination of a hot re-rolling mill was sent back for de novo adjudication because the issue was identical to earlier Supreme Court and Madras High Court decisions and to prior Tribunal directions in similar matters. The adjudicating authority was required to give a fair hearing, avoid reliance on fresh evidence, apply the governing ratio, and determine capacity only on the materials already on record under the Hot-Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the dispute was not finally decided on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the determination of annual capacity of the hot re-rolling mill required remand for fresh adjudication in light of the earlier binding decisions and the Tribunal's directions in a batch of identical matters.

Analysis: The issue was identical to one already considered in earlier decisions of the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court, and the Tribunal had previously remanded similar appeals for de novo consideration with directions to grant fair hearing, avoid fresh evidence, apply the governing ratio, and determine annual capacity on the basis of materials on record in accordance with the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. Following that approach, the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh by the adjudicating authority.

Conclusion: The appeal was allowed by way of remand and the matter was sent back for de novo consideration.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was not finally decided on merits and stood returned to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with the applicable rules and prior binding directions.

---