Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to save obligations and liabilities incurred under Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and proceedings under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 despite their omission.
Analysis: The period in dispute and the proceedings arose before the omission of the relevant provisions. The Tribunal had relied on a contrary view that the omission of Rule 96ZQ and Section 3A defeated the proceedings. The Court followed its earlier Division Bench view that Section 38A preserved pending proceedings and liabilities notwithstanding omission, and therefore the legal objection accepted by the Tribunal could not stand.
Conclusion: The question of law was answered in favour of the appellant and against the assessee.