<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1039 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265764</link>
    <description>Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held to preserve obligations, liabilities and pending proceedings arising under Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 3A despite their omission. The Court followed its earlier Division Bench view that omission of the charging or rule-making provisions did not extinguish pre-existing liabilities where the dispute and proceedings related to the period before omission. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view, that the omission defeated the proceedings, was rejected and the legal question was answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1039 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265764</link>
      <description>Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held to preserve obligations, liabilities and pending proceedings arising under Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 3A despite their omission. The Court followed its earlier Division Bench view that omission of the charging or rule-making provisions did not extinguish pre-existing liabilities where the dispute and proceedings related to the period before omission. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view, that the omission defeated the proceedings, was rejected and the legal question was answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>