Treaty-based taxation of consultancy services applied to gross receipts, not just profit element, under the India-China DTAA.

Under the India-China DTAA, specialised product identification, market research, vendor interaction, quality monitoring, inspection, testing and information-sharing services were treated as managerial, technical or consultancy services, so the service fee paid by an Indian company to a non-resident for work performed in China was taxable in India as fees for technical services. The Authority held that Article 12 also deemed such fees to arise in India when paid by a resident, and that taxation applied to the gross receipt, not merely to the mark-up over cost. The receipt was therefore characterised as consultancy-based fees for technical services taxable at the treaty rate of ten per cent of the gross amount.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the service fee received by the non-resident applicant from the Indian company for services performed in China was taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-China tax treaty and the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether the entire service fee or only the mark-up over cost was chargeable to tax in India; (iii) what was the nature of the receipt and the applicable rate of tax.

Issue (i): whether the service fee received by the non-resident applicant from the Indian company for services performed in China was taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-China tax treaty and the Income-tax Act, 1961

Analysis: The services covered product identification, market research, evaluation, vendor interaction, quality monitoring, inspection, testing, and information sharing, all of which involved specialized skill, expertise, and advisory input. The expression used in Article 12(4) of the India-China DTAA is "provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature", which was held to be wider than language confined to services rendered in the source country. Article 12(6) further deems such fees to arise in India when paid by a resident of India. The receipt was therefore held to fall within the treaty definition of fees for technical services and also within the domestic deeming provision.

Conclusion: The service fee was taxable in India as fees for technical services.

Issue (ii): whether the entire service fee or only the mark-up over cost was chargeable to tax in India

Analysis: The agreement provided for reimbursement of actual costs plus a ten per cent mark-up, but the Authority held that for tax purposes the gross amount received was chargeable. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the tax deduction and charging provisions apply to the gross receipt and do not confine taxation only to the profit element embedded in the receipt.

Conclusion: The entire service fee, and not merely the mark-up, was chargeable to tax in India.

Issue (iii): what was the nature of the receipt and the applicable rate of tax

Analysis: The services were characterised as consultancy services, and once brought within Article 12 of the DTAA, the treaty capped the tax rate at ten per cent of the gross amount. The domestic charging and withholding framework was read consistently with that treaty treatment.

Conclusion: The receipt was taxable as fees for technical services at ten per cent of the gross amount.

Final Conclusion: The applicant's receipt from the Indian company was held taxable in India in full, as consultancy-based fees for technical services, at the treaty rate of ten per cent on the gross amount.

Ratio Decidendi: Under the India-China DTAA, "provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature" covers specialized services used in India even if physically performed in China, and the resulting fee is taxable in India on the gross receipt at the treaty-prescribed rate.

---