Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether consideration received under the technical assistance agreement was taxable as royalty under Article VI of the India-Austria DTAA or as technical services under Article VII, and whether the consideration had to be bifurcated between the two heads for taxability in India.
Analysis: The agreement was held to be a mixed contract involving both supply of technical know-how and rendering of technical services. Royalty, in the DTAA sense, covered amounts paid for the right to use technical information, know-how, patents, designs, secret processes and similar rights, while technical services involved rendering of service, guidance, assistance and implementation support. The Court further held that technical services were taxable in India only to the extent attributable to activities actually performed in India, with deduction of related expenditure, and that services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. The Court also noted that the contract structure and headings alone could not conclusively determine taxability without proper bifurcation on the legal character of the receipts.
Conclusion: Consideration for the right to use technical know-how was taxable as royalty under Article VI; consideration for technical services was taxable under Article VII only to the extent attributable to services performed in India; and technical services rendered outside India were not taxable in India.