Business income and treaty FTS: designs sales escaped Indian tax, while testing-service receipts remained taxable under the DTAA.

Receipts from sale of designs and drawings were treated as business income because the contracts showed sale of a product, not grant of a right to exploit copyright or technical know-how; as the work, sale, and consideration were outside India and no permanent establishment existed, the receipts were not taxable in India. Receipts from testing and related services were held taxable in India under the India-Finland DTAA because the payment was for test results and benefits used in India, and the treaty deeming rule for fees for technical services applied despite the services being performed outside India. The addition on designs and drawings was deleted, while taxability of the service receipts was upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether receipts from sale of designs and drawings were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services, or were business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment; (ii) Whether receipts from testing and other services were taxable in India under the India-Finland DTAA despite the services being performed outside India.

Issue (i): Whether receipts from sale of designs and drawings were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services, or were business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.

Analysis: The designs and drawings were sold as separate items pursuant to contracts and invoices, and the factual matrix showed that the work was carried out outside India, the sale was effected outside India, and the consideration was received outside India. The contractual restriction on intellectual property did not convert a sale of a copyrighted article into use of copyright. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee group's case and held that the consideration was for a product, not for granting a right to exploit intellectual property or for rendering technical services. As the receipts were business income and the assessee had no permanent establishment in India, they could not be taxed in India.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether receipts from testing and other services were taxable in India under the India-Finland DTAA despite the services being performed outside India.

Analysis: Article 12(5) of the DTAA deems fees for technical services to arise in the State where the services are performed, but the Tribunal held that the payment in question was for the test results used in India, not merely for the process of testing. Since the payer was resident in India and the right or property and the resulting benefit were used in India, the receipts were held taxable in India. The exception for services performed outside the State was found inapplicable on the facts.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The addition relating to sale of designs and drawings was deleted, while the taxability of testing and other service receipts in India was upheld, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A receipt for a product embodying designs or drawings sold outside India is business income and not royalty or fees for technical services unless the transaction confers a right to exploit copyright or technical know-how; by contrast, treaty-based fees for technical services may be taxed in India where the payment is for results or benefits used in India and the treaty deeming rule so provides.

---