Appeal partially granted: Negative net worth added to capital gain, book profit deduction to be re-adjudicated.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the addition of negative net worth to the capital gain computation under Section 50B. It directed the First Appellate Authority to re-adjudicate the deduction from book profit arising from the slump sale and remanded the issue of sales tax liability back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The decision was pronounced on 31st August 2015.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of negative net worth of the undertaking transferred under the slump sale to the long-term capital gain under Section 50B.
2. Non-allowance of deduction from the book profit arising out of the sale of the undertaking by way of slump sale.
3. Disallowance of provisions for sales tax liability under Section 43B.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Negative Net Worth to Long-Term Capital Gain:
The primary issue was whether the negative net worth of the undertaking transferred under the slump sale should be added to the sales consideration for computing the capital gain under Section 50B. The Assessing Officer (AO) added the negative net worth of Rs. 3,38,69,898 to the sales consideration, resulting in a higher capital gain. The assessee argued that the cost of acquisition should be taken as NIL when the net worth is negative, referencing the case of Zuari Industries Limited. However, the AO, supported by the decision of the Special Bench in V Summit Securities Limited, held that the negative net worth should be added to the sales consideration. The Tribunal upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing that the computation of net worth under Section 50B must consider all assets and liabilities, and thus, the negative net worth should be included in the capital gain calculation. The Tribunal referred to the methodology for computing net worth as provided in Section 50B, which involves subtracting the value of liabilities from the aggregate value of total assets. The Tribunal rejected the contention that negative net worth should be ignored, stating that such an approach would lead to incorrect capital gain computation.

2. Non-Allowance of Deduction from Book Profit:
The second issue was the non-allowance of a deduction of Rs. 2,03,46,191 from the book profit arising from the sale of the undertaking by way of slump sale. The AO did not adjust this amount in the computation of total income, and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) upheld this decision, noting that no application under Section 154 was filed by the assessee. The Tribunal, however, found merit in the assessee's claim and noted that the profit from the sale of the business undertaking, chargeable under the head capital gains, should have been adjusted in the computation of income. The Tribunal cited the Bombay High Court's decision in Prithvi Brokers, which allows appellate authorities to admit new claims. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the FAA to re-adjudicate the issue after providing a reasonable opportunity for hearing to the assessee.

3. Disallowance of Provisions for Sales Tax Liability:
The third issue was the disallowance of Rs. 51,12,586 under Section 43B, related to the sales tax deferral scheme. The AO disallowed this amount, stating that the sales tax liability was taken over by the buyer. The FAA upheld this decision. The assessee argued that the amount was covered under the deferred sales tax scheme and was eligible for deduction under Section 43B, referencing CBDT Circular No. 496 dated 25.09.1987. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had not provided details of the deferred sales tax amount to the AO or the FAA and directed the AO to verify the claim in accordance with the circular and decide the issue after providing a proper opportunity to the assessee.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the AO's addition of negative net worth to the capital gain computation, directing the FAA to re-adjudicate the deduction from book profit, and remanding the issue of sales tax liability back to the AO for verification. The order was pronounced in the open court on 31st August 2015.

---