Rectification jurisdiction is limited to patent errors and cannot revisit a debatable notification-rate interpretation.

Rectification power under Section 22 of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 is limited to mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used to review an assessment. Where the effect of a notification rate depends on interpretation and the issue admits of more than one possible view, the matter is debatable and outside rectification jurisdiction. The text explains that the dispute over whether the 26.12.2000 notification adopted the rate in the 07.02.2000 notification or attracted the later 30.10.2001 notification required construction of the notification and statutory scheme. On that basis, rectification was not permissible.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessing authority could invoke rectification under Section 22 of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 to revisit the assessment on the basis of the applicable notification rate, when the meaning and effect of the notification involved a debatable question.

Analysis: The rectification power under Section 22 is confined to mistakes apparent from the record. Such power cannot be used to review an assessment or to decide a matter that requires argument, interpretation, or two possible views. The question whether the notification dated 26.12.2000 adopted the rate prevailing under the Uttar Pradesh notification of 07.02.2000 or whether it attracted the later notification of 30.10.2001 was not free from dispute and required consideration of the language of the notification in the context of the sales and the statutory scheme. Since the issue was capable of more than one meaning, it could not be treated as an obvious or patent error.

Conclusion: Rectification under Section 22 was not permissible, and the answer to the substantial question of law was against the revisionist.

Final Conclusion: The assessment could not be reopened through rectification because the controversy was not a patent mistake but a debatable question of law.

Ratio Decidendi: The power of rectification extends only to patent mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be exercised where the alleged error depends on disputed interpretation or admits of more than one legal view.

---