Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the duty demand, interest and penalty pending appeal.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a classification dispute between sand lime bricks and fly ash bricks. At the stay stage, the Tribunal found that the record did not establish, on a prima facie basis, that the goods were fly ash bricks, since no test had been carried out to show conformity with the fly ash brick standard and the ash used was wet pond ash containing moisture. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had a tenable prima facie plea that the bricks remained sand lime bricks, while observing that even on that basis duty was payable at 1% from 1/3/11. In view of the appellant's admitted liability to the extent of about Rs. 3.10 lakhs, the Tribunal considered that amount sufficient for compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under the governing provision.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on depositing Rs. 3,10,000 within the stipulated time.