https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263422 In a stay application arising from a classification dispute over sand lime bricks and fly ash bricks, the Tribunal found no prima facie material establishing that the goods were fly ash bricks, as no conformity test had been conducted and the ash used was wet pond ash containing moisture. It also accepted that the appellant had a tenable prima facie case that the goods were sand lime bricks, while noting that duty would still be payable at 1% from 1/3/11 on that basis. On the admitted liability, the Tribunal treated the stated amount as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263422 In a stay application arising from a classification dispute over sand lime bricks and fly ash bricks, the Tribunal found no prima facie material establishing that the goods were fly ash bricks, as no conformity test had been conducted and the ash used was wet pond ash containing moisture. It also accepted that the appellant had a tenable prima facie case that the goods were sand lime bricks, while noting that duty would still be payable at 1% from 1/3/11 on that basis. On the admitted liability, the Tribunal treated the stated amount as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263422