Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the non-grant of exemption on the admitted facts of the case constituted a mistake apparent on the record and was rectifiable under section 22 of the U. P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The applicant's unit was certified by the Uttar Pradesh Khadi and Gram Udyog Board and the certificate was valid during the relevant assessment year. The exemption notification applied to blacksmithy items such as iron doors and windows, and the same assessing officer had allowed the benefit in earlier assessment years on the same facts. Rectification under section 22 is confined to mistakes that are patent, obvious and discernible from the record, and it does not extend to a revision or review of the order. On the undisputed record, denial of the exemption was an apparent mistake and not a debatable issue requiring further investigation.
Conclusion: The mistake was apparent on the record and was rectifiable under section 22. The authorities below were wrong in refusing rectification, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.