Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether enhancement of tax rate, where the entire turnover had already been assessed but a wrong rate was applied, fell within the scope of section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: Section 21 authorised assessment or reassessment only when the whole or any part of the turnover had escaped assessment to tax. On the facts, the full turnover had been assessed; the defect lay only in the rate applied. The phrase "for any reason" was held to qualify the escape of turnover from assessment, not to widen the provision to every kind of error. The proviso also applied only where turnover had escaped assessment, not where assessment was complete but the rate was incorrect. The proper course was correction of error by rectification, not reassessment under section 21.
Conclusion: Section 21 did not permit reopening of the assessment merely to enhance the rate of tax after full assessment of the turnover; the answer was against the Commissioner and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment provisions limited to escaped turnover cannot be invoked solely to correct an erroneous tax rate where the entire turnover was already assessed.