Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of affording personal hearing under Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The provision governing assessment under Section 22(4) required that, before proceeding to best judgment assessment, the dealer be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The order was passed without affording such personal hearing, and the record did not show compliance with this mandatory safeguard. The absence of an effective opportunity to explain the return filings and supporting claim amounted to violation of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order was unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration after providing personal hearing.