AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2015 (8) TMI 538
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Manoharan Sundaram, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) for the respondent. 2. This writ petition is directed against the order of the respondent dated 13.02.2015. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent before passing the impugned order, has not adhered to the mandatory conditions mentioned under Sectio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel for the petitioner further contended that immediately on receipt of the notice dated 28.01.2015, the petitioner also submitted their reply on 04.02.2015, bringing to the notice of the respondent that they have filed the monthly returns in Form -I for December 2012, January 2012, February 2013 and March 2013 and claimed ITC through 'e' filing. Therefore, according to him, the responden....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d ITC, it is incumbent on the part of the petitioner to prove his claim by producing all the relevant documents and as they did not do so, the respondent had to pass the impugned order and therefore, no interference is called for. 7. This Court finds no justification whatsoever to accept the impugned order, since the contention made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there has been ....