Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and complete stay pending appeal in a dispute involving construction services and exemption claims.
Analysis: The demand arose from two show cause notices covering construction of independent residential units and construction of a corporate office. The consideration for the two activities was not segregated in either the notices or the impugned order. On a prima facie view, construction of the corporate office for the electricity distribution utility did not appear to be taxable as a service in relation to transmission of electricity. Alternatively, the work was treated as a works contract involving both goods and services, making the value of the goods component eligible for exclusion. In the absence of segregation of the consideration, the liability was estimated broadly, and the estimated taxable exposure after the available exemption benefit was assessed at about Rs. 18 lakhs.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 18 lakhs plus proportionate interest within six weeks, and recovery proceedings were stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: In an interim stay matter, where the demand is not segregated between distinct activities and the assessee shows a prima facie entitlement to exemption or exclusion of the goods component in a works contract, the tribunal may fix a limited pre-deposit on a broad estimated liability and grant stay of recovery pending appeal.