Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (7) TMI 726 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal remits AO's undisclosed income addition for verification, upholds CIT(A)'s decisions on disallowances. The Tribunal partly allowed the department's appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for verification while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal remits AO's undisclosed income addition for verification, upholds CIT(A)'s decisions on disallowances.

                              The Tribunal partly allowed the department's appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for verification while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on other issues. The AO's addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500 based on undisclosed income was remitted for verification. Disallowances under Sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) were also remitted for further examination, while the disallowance of expenditure claimed by the assessee was upheld.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500 based on additional evidence.
                              2. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act.
                              3. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.
                              4. Disallowance of expenditure claimed by the assessee.

                              Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500 Based on Additional Evidence:
                              The department challenged the decision of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500. The assessee, engaged in the real estate business, had filed its return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 28,66,090. During the assessment, the AO found that the assessee did not produce its books of account despite repeated opportunities. Consequently, the AO completed the assessment based on impounded material from a survey which indicated that the assessee received amounts in both white (Rs. 54,31,500) and black (Rs. 1,29,28,500) for the sale of plots. The AO treated the black money as undisclosed income. The assessee contended before the CIT(A) that the black money was actually development charges recorded as advances in the books of account. The CIT(A) agreed with the assessee and deleted the addition. However, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) should have given the AO an opportunity to verify the facts before deleting the addition and remitted the matter back to the AO for verification and decision.

                              2. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act:
                              The AO disallowed Rs. 13,09,996 (20% of Rs. 54,49,980) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, claiming they were not in compliance with Section 40A(3). The assessee argued that the payments were made in villages without banking facilities, falling under the exception provided under Rule 6DD. The CIT(A) accepted this claim and deleted the disallowance. However, the Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) accepted the claim without proper verification and remitted the matter back to the AO to verify the assessee's claim and decide accordingly.

                              3. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act:
                              The AO disallowed Rs. 1,25,94,603 for payments made without deducting tax at source, including agent commission, advertisement expenses, rent, and development charges. The assessee contended that TDS was deducted and remitted for agent commission and part of the development charges, while the balance was offered to tax. The rent payments were below the threshold for TDS, and the development charges were incurred by the assessee itself, not paid to contractors. The CIT(A) accepted these explanations and deleted the disallowance. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding agent commission and part of the development charges but remitted the matter back to the AO for verification of rent payments and development charges.

                              4. Disallowance of Expenditure Claimed by the Assessee:
                              The AO disallowed 10% of various expenditures totaling Rs. 52,88,539 due to lack of supporting bills and vouchers. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to specific expenses (development, site visit, survey charges, and preliminary expenses) totaling Rs. 64,79,929. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s decision just and proper, noting that the assessee had incurred these expenditures and had already disallowed unsupported expenses. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on this issue.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal partly allowed the department's appeal for statistical purposes, remitting certain issues back to the AO for verification while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on other issues.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found