<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 726 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the department&#039;s appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for verification while upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on other issues. The AO&#039;s addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500 based on undisclosed income was remitted for verification. Disallowances under Sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) were also remitted for further examination, while the disallowance of expenditure claimed by the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 726 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the department&#039;s appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for verification while upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on other issues. The AO&#039;s addition of Rs. 1,29,28,500 based on undisclosed income was remitted for verification. Disallowances under Sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) were also remitted for further examination, while the disallowance of expenditure claimed by the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>