Appeal partially allowed, unexplained bank credits to be added. Remitted for fresh assessment. Fair opportunity granted.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing that only unexplained credits from bank deposits should be added. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment, providing the assessee with a fair opportunity. The Tribunal's decision was issued on July 10, 2015, in Pune.

---

---

Issues involved:
Appeal against addition of Rs. 30,17,000 as unexplained cash credit and unexplained investment u/s. 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2008-09.

Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 30,17,000 as unexplained cash credit:
The assessee, a salaried employee, filed income tax return declaring income from salary and short-term capital gains. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer noted cash deposits of Rs. 31,17,000 in various bank accounts. The assessee attributed these deposits to agricultural income and loans for property purchase. The AO accepted Rs. 1,00,000 as agricultural income and added the balance under section 68 as unexplained cash credit. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition under section 69. The assessee contended that the deposits were from agricultural income and loans, supported by bank statements and confirmation letters from lenders. The Tribunal observed the deposits and loans details provided by the assessee, concluding that not the entire deposits but only unexplained credits should be added. The matter was remitted to the AO for fresh consideration.

2. Treatment of agricultural income and investment:
The assessee claimed agricultural income of Rs. 6,34,093, supported by sale proceeds deposited in bank accounts. However, the Tribunal rejected the contention, upholding the disclosed agricultural income of Rs. 1,00,000. Regarding the addition under section 69 as unexplained investment, the Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner's findings. It clarified that mere bank deposits do not constitute investment unless used for future financial returns. The Tribunal directed that only unexplained credits should be added, remanding the issue for fresh assessment.

3. Conclusion:
The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing that only unexplained credits should be added from bank deposits. The matter was referred back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision, ensuring due opportunity for the assessee. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on July 10, 2015, in Pune.

---