<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 638 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing that only unexplained credits from bank deposits should be added. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment, providing the assessee with a fair opportunity. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on July 10, 2015, in Pune.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 638 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing that only unexplained credits from bank deposits should be added. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment, providing the assessee with a fair opportunity. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on July 10, 2015, in Pune.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>