Tribunal allows 'Mark to Market' loss on forward exchange contracts as business loss for tax The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the 'Mark to Market' loss on forward exchange contracts as a business loss for income tax purposes. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal allows 'Mark to Market' loss on forward exchange contracts as business loss for tax
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the "Mark to Market" loss on forward exchange contracts as a business loss for income tax purposes. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant case law, emphasizing the consistent accounting practices and lack of revenue impact in such transactions.
Issues: 1. Allowability of "Mark to Market" loss on valuation of forward exchange contracts as a business loss for income tax purposes.
Analysis: The Revenue challenged an order regarding the assessment year 2009-10 under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in diamond manufacturing and trading, incurred a loss on foreign exchange forward contracts revaluation. The Assessing Officer disallowed the loss, but the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed it, citing relevant case law. The assessee relied on a Special Bench decision and a Supreme Court judgment to support their claim. The Tribunal considered various decisions and upheld the Commissioner's decision, treating the loss as an allowable business loss.
The Tribunal emphasized that the loss on matured foreign exchange contracts should be allowed as a business loss, following precedents and considering the integral nature of the contracts to diamond exports. The Special Bench decision in another case supported the allowance of Mark to Market losses on forward foreign exchange contracts, highlighting the binding obligation, consistent accounting method, crystallized liability, and lack of revenue effect. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to allow the loss incurred by the assessee on re-statement of pending forward contract agreements as a business loss, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the "Mark to Market" loss on forward exchange contracts as a business loss for income tax purposes. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant case law, emphasizing the consistent accounting practices and lack of revenue impact in such transactions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.